Victor as God in Frank?nst?in: Th? Mod?rn Prom?th?usTh? Sci?nc? fictional story titl?d Frank?nst?in includ?s a s?lf c?nt?r?d mad sci?ntist nam?d Victor Frank?nst?in. Victor b?com?s absolut?ly obs?ss?d with his pow?r to b? god and cr?at? lif?. H? go?s as far as actually cr?ating lif?. Som? would say what h? cr?at?d is aliv? and looks som?what human-lik? but what h? cr?at?d was a monst?r. This pow?r corr?lat?s to God but th? diff?r?nc? is that god is known to b? p?rf?ct wh?n cr?ating whil? Victor is not. Lastly, th? rol? of Victor’s Prid? forms an int?r?sting topic and discussion of Victor Frank?nst?in’s charact?r.Victor d?cid?d to mak? a cr?ation out of body parts that h? stol? from p?opl?’s grav?s. But h? didn’t r?aliz? that th? body parts h? was using w?r? from s?mi-rotting p?opl? which ?xplains why his cr?ation look?d lik? a monst?r. “Nor could I consid?r th? magnitud? and compl?xity of my plan as any argum?nt of its impracticability. It was with th?s? f??lings that I b?gan th? cr?ation of a human b?ing.” (Sh?lly 54) Victor cr?at?d a cr?atur? unpl?asing to th? ?y? which caus?d soci?ty to r?act so horribly. Wh?n Victor was much young?r, his int?r?sts mainly w?r? sci?nc? and ch?mistry. But of all of th?m was an id?a of lif? and d?ath balanc?s. Victor w?nt on to coll?g? and b?cam? mor? obs?ss?d with th? id?a of cr?ating lif?. Inst?ad of starting out small, Victor took a hug? l?ap and tri?d to cr?at? a human. “Aft?r days and nights of incr?dibl? labor and fatigu?, I succ??d?d in discov?ring th? caus? of g?n?ration and lif?; nay, mor?, I b?cam? mys?lf capabl? of b?stowing animation upon lif?l?ss matt?r.” (Sh?lly 30) Victor s?ts up his car??r focus?d on cr?ating lif? through sci?nc?. H? did not hav? any magical or sup?rnatural pow?rs so h? n??d?d his knowl?dg? of sci?nc? to guid? him. Victor’s obs?ssion and d?t?rmination b?cam? so ignorant and s?lfish that h? lost all morals and b?cam? god. “A n?w sp?ci?s would bl?ss m? as its cr?ator and sourc?; many happy and ?xc?ll?nt natur?s would ow? th?ir b?ing to m?.” (Sh?lly 55) In Victor’s mind, cr?ating lif? is pr?stigious. It would b? a hug? discov?ry. Som? p?opl? would lov? it, oth?rs would b? afraid. But Victor ignor?d th? majority of oth?rs who oppos?d his studi?s and only thought about hims?lf. In th? s?tting of th? story, cr?ating lif? would b? b?yond incr?dibl? but not in a good way. Victor’s prid? and s?lfishn?ss forc?d him to b?li?v? ?v?rything h? did was gr?at. Victor’s confid?nc? blind?d him of th? ?nd r?sult wh?r? h? would hav? to fac? th? cons?qu?nc?s for his actions. H? w?nt forth with his att?mpt for discov?ry and h? was succ?ssful. H? cr?at?d lif? and was ?xcit?d at first but th?n th? long?r h? watch?d his cr?ating caus? mor? harm than good h? b?com?s guilty and s??s his wrongdoings. Victor f?lt guilty for his actions and att?mpt?d to fix his t?rribl? mistak?.”I f?lt as if I had committ?d som? gr?at crim?, th? consciousn?ss of which haunt?d m?. I was guiltl?ss, but I had ind??d drawn down a horribl? curs? upon my h?ad, as mortal is that of crim?.” (Sh?lly 167) Aft?r littl? thought, unfortunat?ly, Victor’s mind did not chang? a whol? lot. His prid? spik?s aft?r his cr?ation r?qu?st?d a companion. In Victor’s mind this was a bonus. Th? probl?ms h? and many oth?rs had with th? monst?r would d?cr?as? if th? monst?r was happi?r. Th? only thing stopping Victor from cr?ating anoth?r cr?atur? is that h? didn’t want to cr?at? anoth?r disgusting looking human rac?. “…on? of th? first r?sults of thos? sympathi?s for which th? da?mon thirst?d would b? childr?n, and a rac? of d?vils would b? propagat?d upon th? ?arth.” (Sh?lly 170) Victor n?v?r m?ntions that his cr?ation was th? primary caus? of William’s d?ath. Sinc? Victor cr?at?d th? monst?r, Victor should b? th? on? to blam?. Victor’s s?lfishn?ss to avoid blam? only mak?s soci?ty dislik? th? cr?atur? mor? causing th? cr?atur? to b? mor? ups?t and do mor? d?struction. Both th? s?lfishn?ss and prid? of Victor Frank?nst?in caus? probl?m aft?r probl?m throughout th? story. Victor is ignorant wh?n cr?ating th? monst?r b?caus? h? do?snt think twic? b?for? action. A tragic murd?r occurs that gr?atly aff?cts lif? n?gativ?ly. Aft?rall, Victor Frank?nst?in’s att?mpts at playing th? rol? of god is flaw?d by ?xc?ssiv? hubris. Th?r?for?, Victor plays God.
The Best Critical Essays
- Ever since before I entered junior high, given
- (no title)
- Introduction attack can be uniform, localised, or selective.
- According of the resources we have around us.Xenotransplantation
- Agribusiness manufacturing the food products also part of
- According lose track of the good and the
- Michael where he instructed government officials to take
- The 737 jetliner flying passengers, luggage and even